<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>devolute.net &#187; Media</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.devolute.net/category/media/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.devolute.net</link>
	<description>That which should be neither uttered nor expressed</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Jul 2010 19:05:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>A public service anouncement for Private Eye readers</title>
		<link>http://www.devolute.net/2010/03/24/a-public-service-anouncement-for-private-eye-readers/</link>
		<comments>http://www.devolute.net/2010/03/24/a-public-service-anouncement-for-private-eye-readers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Mar 2010 17:24:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ian</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Private Eye]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.devolute.net/?p=692</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is the cover of this weeks magazine. Nice headline huh? Because of this you should expect, as I did, to possibly find fortnights edition to be nestled between more, erm, specialist magazines. You know the ones with nekkid ladies all over them? Yeah, there. Especially if, like me, you buy your literature from motorway [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-691" title="Private Eye: Leaders Wives cover" src="http://www.devolute.net/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/P1000904-e1269390569124.jpg" alt="Private Eye: Leaders Wives cover" width="499" height="666" /></p>
<p>This is the cover of this weeks magazine. Nice headline huh? Because of this you should expect, as I did, to possibly find fortnights edition to be nestled between more, erm, <em>specialist</em> magazines. You know the ones with nekkid ladies all over them? Yeah, there. Especially if, like me, you buy your literature from motorway service stations. At least they didn&#8217;t put them in an opaque white bag.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.devolute.net/2010/03/24/a-public-service-anouncement-for-private-eye-readers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Boxee box: great news for indie media &amp; consumers</title>
		<link>http://www.devolute.net/2009/12/10/boxee-box-great-news-for-indie-media-consumers/</link>
		<comments>http://www.devolute.net/2009/12/10/boxee-box-great-news-for-indie-media-consumers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 13:15:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ian</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Boxee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[open-source]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[XBMC]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.devolute.net/?p=584</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8230;and for those wanting to cancel their cable/sky packages. Here&#8217;s why: I&#8217;ve been a member of the Boxee Alpha test for a while now and it showed a huge amount of potential. Boxee is, at its most simple, a media player that draws content from the net (Division3, iPlayer, Blip.tv etc.) and from your local [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230;and for those wanting to cancel their cable/sky packages. Here&#8217;s why:<br />
I&#8217;ve been a member of the <a href="http://www.boxee.tv/">Boxee</a> Alpha test for a while now and it showed a huge amount of potential. Boxee is, at its most simple, a media player that draws content from the net (Division3, iPlayer, Blip.tv etc.) and from your local network (ripped DVDs, your music library, downloaded tv shows). This content is then presented in a wonderful &#8216;made for big screen&#8217; (read: your tv, not your 15&#8243; laptop monitor) easily navigable interface. A rather gorgeous interface too, I might add. Well, certainly in the Alpha, I&#8217;m a little unsettled by the new beta interface but it is well ahead of the rigidness of the AppleTV and the ugly mess of any recent Microsoft efforts. Boxee is based on <a href="http://xbmc.org/about/">XBMC</a>, a brilliant Open-source media player with a similar, but not as ambitious, desire to take over your tv.  Boxee adds web-content to XBMC&#8217;s marvelous local network media management. I&#8217;ve been running XBMC on a hand-me-down 1st-gen XBox (thanks Ed!) for a couple of years now and it kicks the ass of Windows Media Centre and the like. It just works. No codec bullshit, no delay, no fiddling.</p>
<div id="attachment_587" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 490px"><img class="size-full wp-image-587" title="The Boxee box" src="http://www.devolute.net/wp-content/uploads/2009/12/boxee_box.jpg" alt="The Boxee box" width="480" height="348" /><p class="wp-caption-text">The Boxee box</p></div>
<p>This alpha potential has been realized in the form of the <a href="http://blog.boxee.tv/2009/12/09/step-1-make-a-boxee-box-no-need-to-cut-a-hole/">newly announced</a> beta and the Boxee Box. Although Boxee is quite intuitive to use, it can be a total bugger to setup, as was XBMC before it. Your options are hack your Apple TV or build a Linux machine and dive into a bundle of .debs and Pulse audio problems. Oh, and good luck on 64-bit Ubuntu, it&#8217;s a bloody nightmare! The Boxee Box removes all these headaches and essentially makes Boxee suitable for non-geeks. It&#8217;s built by DLink, who in my experience seem to churn out reasonable rooters/modems, and <a href="http://mashable.com/2009/12/07/boxee-box-dlink/">we&#8217;re promised</a> it&#8217;ll cost a quite reasonable $200. This investment will open up a world of couch-accessible online content. There is a growing amount of independent media available online and bringing it from tiny laptop screens and onto that new 37&#8243; monster you have in your living room could be the shot in the arm that many indie shows need.</p>
<p>I was going to blog about how stupid the case design was. &#8220;Don&#8217;t they understand that people are still going to have audio equipment/a DVD recorder/etc under their TV?&#8221;, I prepared myself to rant, &#8220;don&#8217;t they realize that such a bizarre shape will make it impossible to stack and fit under televisions?&#8221;. But as further details have emerged, it seems that the Box is so small that none of this should be a concern and as the remote control is RF then you could even hide it behind your flat-screen if you want.</p>
<div id="attachment_588" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 310px"><img class="size-full wp-image-588" title="This thing is seriously small" src="http://www.devolute.net/wp-content/uploads/2009/12/IMG_3755-300x225.jpg" alt="This thing is seriously small" width="300" height="225" /><p class="wp-caption-text">This thing is seriously small</p></div>
<p>The closest thing we&#8217;ve seen to this has been the Apple TV, which like Boxee could view web content. But being Apple, you were tied into the Apple iTunes marketplace, and thinking. No thanks, Jobs, no DRM crap for me. The Boxee Box&#8217;s design, cost and potential have lead to a very desirable little product and it is a testament to the Open-source projects that have gone before it. Put me down for one.</p>
<p>(More details on <a href="http://blog.boxee.tv/">the Boxee blog</a>)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.devolute.net/2009/12/10/boxee-box-great-news-for-indie-media-consumers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Design for Life</title>
		<link>http://www.devolute.net/2009/10/04/design-for-life/</link>
		<comments>http://www.devolute.net/2009/10/04/design-for-life/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Oct 2009 18:42:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ian</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alan Sugar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BBC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Design for life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philippe Stark]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the Apprentice]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.devolute.net/?p=516</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Like most new BBC television programs, Design for Life takes its name from a 90s pop song. The Manics, durrr. Like &#8216;Life of Riley&#8216; and, erm, I&#8217;m sure there is something else&#8230; well unlike most Caroline Quentin vehicles, Design for Life isn&#8217;t shit. As is the norm now for most new BBC television programs, it [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Like most new BBC television programs, <strong>Design for Life</strong> takes its name from a 90s pop song. The Manics, durrr. Like &#8216;<em>Life of Riley</em>&#8216; and, erm, I&#8217;m sure there is something else&#8230; well unlike most Caroline Quentin vehicles, <em>Design for Life</em> <em>isn&#8217;t</em> shit.</p>
<p>As is the norm now for most new BBC television programs, it takes about 7 minutes to get started. Those first 7 minutes of the show are catching up, explaining what happened in the previous episode. In this day of Sky+, HDD recorders and (more importantly) iPlayer, is this necessary? I know it makes the show cheaper to make, but for crying out loud. Just make it a little shorter if you&#8217;re going to piss around so much.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s shot beautifully well and we get to see plenty of the beautiful bits of Paris, as apposed to the hours and hours of shots of that bloody Gerkin thing in London that anyone who watches <em>the Apprentice</em> has forced upon them. When talking about this show, I&#8217;m going to compare it to <em>the Apprentice</em>, because the similarities are obvious (and I&#8217;m lazy). It features a team of designers (business men?) who fight to show they are the best designer (most shouty business man?) to prove they can work with designer extraordinaire, Philipee Stark (Suralun?).</p>
<div id="attachment_531" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 456px"><img class="size-full wp-image-531" title="the Design for Life participants" src="http://www.devolute.net/wp-content/uploads/2009/10/feature_design_for_life.jpg" alt="the Design for Life participants" width="446" height="251" /><p class="wp-caption-text">the Design for Life participants</p></div>
<p>Participant Nebil is the most &#8216;Apprentice like&#8217;, because he patronizes everyone he gets to talk to. This probably is an attempt to look better than everyone else but at least he does know his shit. I&#8217;m sure that to anyone who actually has their design game-face on, his &#8220;let me just explain this too you, thicko&#8221; tone will probably make him look like a bit of a dick. Still, he gets a lot of screen time because he has a lot to say and even his dick-ishness is minor compared with the mega-cocks that rut around in any given episode of <em>the Apprentice</em>. He gets his come-upance tho, which is another reason why I love this show. It&#8217;s obvious that the shows producers set him off against the other stand-out, Ilsa, because she&#8217;s got a pretty good set of claws and will bite back.</p>
<p>I guess a large part of the show will boil down to &#8220;do you like Philipee Stark&#8221;. I do. Him and his bloody chairs, or whatever the hell he&#8217;s supposed to be most famous for. He&#8217;s pretentious, but y&#8217;know he&#8217;s a brilliant designer so he can afford to be and after all, this is design. You&#8217;re supposed to be pretentious. He also dismisses the participants easily, based on some seemingly whimsical idea he has. Again: he&#8217;s a designer. I&#8217;ve had designers happily shit on my ideas in the past and non of them were exactly Phillipee Stark. At least when he drops people he&#8217;s really nice about it. I&#8217;d love to be sacked by him. None of this catch-phrase &#8220;You&#8217;re fired&#8221; crap. I also like his attitude towards &#8216;wasteful&#8217; design. He&#8217;s green without being sickly. Personally Alan Sugar really gets on my tits because turned Amstrad into crap (I love my old CPC6128) and I tire of his attitude and his stupid Labour &#8216;business-tzar&#8217; beard.</p>
<p>Further contrasts to <em>the Apprentice</em> are easy to highlight. The participants are young, attractive and probably smell quite good. They are also very, very white. And middle class uni-graduates. They actually get very visibly nervous, which makes you feel a little more sympathetic. Hell, in the 2nd episode one of the participants has a genuinely great idea: Polly and her water-level meter. What have the Apprentice chimps ever done, but chuck crap at each other? <em>Design for Life</em> actually talks about design. Pitching, ideas, briefs, presentations and all the bullshit in-between. That&#8217;s some real genuine content from the BBC.</p>
<p>The show is at 9.00pm on BBC 2, Mondays but <a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b00mx9y1">you can follow the show here, on iPlayer</a>.</p>
<p>As an aside; it&#8217;s narrated by Adam &#8216;Adam + Joe&#8217; Buxton. I look forward to the DVD release where Joe does a funny-man voice-over.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.devolute.net/2009/10/04/design-for-life/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Oh the Humanity! in 25 words or more</title>
		<link>http://www.devolute.net/2009/09/21/oh-the-humanity-in-25-words-or-more/</link>
		<comments>http://www.devolute.net/2009/09/21/oh-the-humanity-in-25-words-or-more/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 19:30:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ian</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[more of this sort of thing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alan Partridge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Daily Mail]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.devolute.net/?p=512</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is one of the finest headlines I&#8217;ve ever seen crafted by the wordsmiths at the Mail. I think they&#8217;ve channeled a certain similarly perceptive master of language in writing this. Does anyone remember this classic line from Alan Partridge?  More of this please. I don&#8217;t want to read an article. If you can&#8217;t consolidate [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is one of the <a href="http://twitpic.com/ikqa8">finest headlines I&#8217;ve ever seen</a> crafted by the wordsmiths at the Mail. I think they&#8217;ve channeled a certain similarly perceptive master of language in writing this. Does anyone remember <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GtURTBLuNtg#t=1m27s">this classic line from Alan Partridge</a>?  More of this please. I don&#8217;t want to read an article. If you can&#8217;t consolidate a complete &#8216;story&#8217; in the headline, then don&#8217;t bother.</p>
<p>Via the ever brilliant <a href="http://twitter.com/bengoldacre">@bengoldacre</a> &#8211; an essential follow.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.devolute.net/2009/09/21/oh-the-humanity-in-25-words-or-more/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Differences between Current TV UK and US can be a little depressing</title>
		<link>http://www.devolute.net/2009/09/11/differences-between-current-tv-uk-and-us-can-be-a-little-depressing/</link>
		<comments>http://www.devolute.net/2009/09/11/differences-between-current-tv-uk-and-us-can-be-a-little-depressing/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2009 16:39:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ian</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[crap journalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Current TV]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.devolute.net/?p=494</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Current TV are an indie tv network who, I&#8217;m guessing reasonably confidently, depend mainly on the web for viewers.  They&#8217;ve done some good stuff. In particular, one thing I watched that stuck in my mind was a documentary on Russian nazi gangs who attack foreign students. It was hard hitting, it wasn&#8217;t the sort of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://current.com/">Current TV</a> are an indie tv network who, I&#8217;m guessing reasonably confidently, depend mainly on the web for viewers.  They&#8217;ve done some good stuff. In particular, one thing I watched that stuck in my mind was <a href="http://current.com/items/84906361_from-russia-with-hate.htm">a documentary on Russian nazi gangs</a> who attack foreign students. It was hard hitting, it wasn&#8217;t the sort of thing you&#8217;d see on the BBC or CNN. It was &#8216;forgotten world&#8217; reporting, exactly the sort of thing Current TV should do.  Naturally, I follow both <a href="http://twitter.com/current">CurrentTV US</a> and <a href="http://twitter.com/currentuk">Current TV UK</a> on Twitter and something recently struck me.</p>
<p>Here in the UK we sometimes like to poke fun at the US&#8217;s attitude to current affairs reporting. Maybe we&#8217;ll laugh at the CNN homepage as it becomes full of reports of Britneys latest outburst. Or possibly we&#8217;d compare measured debate on Newsnight to O Reily / Becks insane outbursts. But on the web and especially at Current TV, the US often takes the intellectual high-ground (or at least the high-brow ground).  I attach the following as evidence from my Twitter client:</p>
<div id="attachment_496" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 479px"><img class="size-full wp-image-496" title="Current TV on my twitter client" src="http://www.devolute.net/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/current_twit.png" alt="Current TV on my twitter client" width="469" height="230" /><p class="wp-caption-text">Current TV in my twitter feed</p></div>
<p>Sadly, this sort of contrast is pretty typical. If you don&#8217;t believe me, I recommend you <a href="http://current.com/">go to the Current website</a> and use the top-right icon to switch between the British and American versions. So in short: come on Current UK! You&#8217;ve got some great staff and in the UK we&#8217;d love some relevant localised reporting. Surpass your US brother and don&#8217;t fall into the Heat Magazine pit.</p>
<p><em>(yes, I realise I posted this just after kittens. Shameful)</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.devolute.net/2009/09/11/differences-between-current-tv-uk-and-us-can-be-a-little-depressing/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>10:10 is a good idea but is in danger of doing more harm than good</title>
		<link>http://www.devolute.net/2009/09/07/1010-is-a-good-idea-but-is-in-danger-of-doing-more-harm-than-good/</link>
		<comments>http://www.devolute.net/2009/09/07/1010-is-a-good-idea-but-is-in-danger-of-doing-more-harm-than-good/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Sep 2009 17:46:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ian</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[10:10]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Guardian]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[parody]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.devolute.net/?p=489</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This weekends article by Madeleine Bunting for the Guardian reads like parody. Lifestyle changes which will have arguably minimal positive effect on the environment: check. Angst over carbon footprint whilst still taking flights abroad and owning a large house: check. And as if to round off the parody so perfectly: Two paragraphs detailing the guilt [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This weekends <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/cif-green/2009/sep/06/carbon-footprint-aga-energy-saving">article by Madeleine Bunting</a> for the Guardian reads like parody. Lifestyle changes which will have arguably minimal positive effect on the environment: check. Angst over carbon footprint whilst still taking flights abroad and owning a large house: check. And as if to round off the parody so perfectly: Two paragraphs detailing the guilt of Aga ownership! Perfect!  This is article, along with many disappointingly similar others, is part of <a href="http://www.1010uk.org/">the Guardians new 10:10 campaign</a>. The idea is for us to sign up and make personal carbon cuts ourselves, 10% in 2010, so that pressure is put on the government to make similar efforts. It would be nice to think that we&#8217;d spend a little more time putting pressure on industry who of course are the real big polluters and whatever private citizens do is next to useless if we can&#8217;t get them on board.</p>
<p><img class="size-full wp-image-490" title="1010 logo" src="http://www.devolute.net/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/1010.png" alt="1010 logo" width="278" height="118" /></p>
<p>The 10:10 campaign was launched in the Tate Modern because obviously a more smug middle class location was not available.I think the <a href="http://www.1010uk.org/people#what_is_1010">10:10 tags</a> are set to become some of this years more desirable items. Like those &#8216;Make Poverty History&#8217; bracelets (I wonder how that one turned out?). All in all I think it&#8217;s a great idea. However it may contain too many elements which put us in danger of creating a wall of smugness that distances those who honestly care about climate change from those who are yet to sign up for the full effort.</p>
<p>Web developer hat on: The <a href="http://www.1010uk.org/">10:10 website</a> is superb in both it&#8217;s design and execution, except totally unnecessary use of flash of course.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.devolute.net/2009/09/07/1010-is-a-good-idea-but-is-in-danger-of-doing-more-harm-than-good/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Moon coverage spoof is perfect analogy for what&#8217;s wrong with tv news</title>
		<link>http://www.devolute.net/2009/07/27/moon-coverage-is-perfect-analogy-for-whats-wrong-with-tv-news/</link>
		<comments>http://www.devolute.net/2009/07/27/moon-coverage-is-perfect-analogy-for-whats-wrong-with-tv-news/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2009 18:18:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ian</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[robots.txt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rupert Murdoch]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.devolute.net/?p=464</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What do you think? What are the blogs saying? What have twitter-users voted? All questions that are asked by the &#8216;mainstream media&#8217; in their desperate (and some might say futile) attempt not to be rendered completely irrelevant by &#8216;new media&#8217;. This video, although obviously delivered tongue in cheek, is actually quite believable. There is less [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><object classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" width="425" height="344" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0"><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always" /><param name="src" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/dClpox7qinI&amp;hl=en&amp;fs=1&amp;hd=1" /><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true" /><embed type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="425" height="344" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/dClpox7qinI&amp;hl=en&amp;fs=1&amp;hd=1" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true"></embed></object></p>
<p>What do you think? What are the blogs saying? What have twitter-users voted? All questions that are asked by the &#8216;mainstream media&#8217; in their desperate (and some might say futile) attempt not to be rendered completely irrelevant by &#8216;new media&#8217;.  This video, although obviously delivered tongue in cheek, is actually quite believable. There is less of a whirlwind of tacky special effects and switching between scenes on tv news here in the UK, but the desperate call for viewer feedback is still there. It&#8217;s gotten quite embarrassing; even on previously quite clever shows like <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ymCABOB_gPk">Newsnight</a>.</p>
<p>Maybe it&#8217;ll stop. Maybe Rupert Murdoch will <a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/rupert_murdoch_lets_charge_for_online_content_again.php">work out how to use robots.txt</a>. Probably not before we&#8217;ve all stopped getting our news from our television sets.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.devolute.net/2009/07/27/moon-coverage-is-perfect-analogy-for-whats-wrong-with-tv-news/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Stewart Lee&#8217;s Comedy Vehicle</title>
		<link>http://www.devolute.net/2009/03/17/stewart-lees-comedy-vehicle/</link>
		<comments>http://www.devolute.net/2009/03/17/stewart-lees-comedy-vehicle/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2009 21:32:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ian</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BBC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[comedy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stand-up]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stewart Leigh]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.devolute.net/?p=404</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Stewart Lee isn&#8217;t just good at pissing off Christians, he&#8217;s also a very funny stand-up comic. Now he might not be everyone&#8217;s cup of tea, but it&#8217;s great to have a comedian on that early in the evening on BBC2 who doesn&#8217;t insult my intelligence. Especially as he spends most of the time slagging off [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div id="attachment_405" class="wp-caption alignright" style="width: 210px"><img class="size-full wp-image-405" title="Stewart Lee" src="http://www.devolute.net/wp-content/uploads/2009/03/stewart_leigh.jpg" alt="Stewart Lee" width="200" height="231" /><p class="wp-caption-text">Stewart Lee</p></div>
<p>Stewart Lee isn&#8217;t just good at pissing off Christians, he&#8217;s also a very funny stand-up comic. Now he might not be everyone&#8217;s cup of tea, but it&#8217;s great to have a comedian on that early in the evening on BBC2 who doesn&#8217;t insult my intelligence. Especially as he spends most of the time slagging off the BBC staples of Moyles, Clarkson et al. It&#8217;s not even a one off. He&#8217;s got a series out of it. God knows who let that happen. Presumably the same person who allowed the classic <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/This_Morning_With_Richard_Not_Judy">TMWRNJ</a> with Richard Herring. It&#8217;s even produced by Armando Iannucci for crying out loud! What more do you people want?</p>
<p>Last nights show focused on &#8216;Toilet Books&#8217;, or rather celebrity hardbacks. Leigh deals with the whole thing not with anger, or angst but with a lofty disapproval. He&#8217;s cleverer than all of us (and of course much funnier). That&#8217;s just something we have to deal with.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/iplayer/episode/b00jd8gp/Stewart_Lees_Comedy_Vehicle_Toilet_Books/">See it on iPlayer here for the next few days</a>.</p>
<p>And yes, it&#8217;s got the actor Kevin Eldon in it, obviously.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.devolute.net/2009/03/17/stewart-lees-comedy-vehicle/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8216;The Office&#8217; Musical</title>
		<link>http://www.devolute.net/2009/03/02/the-office-musical/</link>
		<comments>http://www.devolute.net/2009/03/02/the-office-musical/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2009 12:56:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ian</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ed Helms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mashup]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the Office]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tv]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.devolute.net/?p=386</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Star of this is Ed Helms of course, who&#8217;s musical stylings are probably the best part of the whole show. This post is primarily for one of my keenest commenters, Rami. via Huff post]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><object width="425" height="344" data="http://www.youtube.com/v/xOCsXFKrxJw&amp;color1=0xb1b1b1&amp;color2=0xcfcfcf&amp;hl=en&amp;feature=player_embedded&amp;fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash"><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="src" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/xOCsXFKrxJw&amp;color1=0xb1b1b1&amp;color2=0xcfcfcf&amp;hl=en&amp;feature=player_embedded&amp;fs=1" /><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true" /></object></p>
<p>Star of this is Ed Helms of course, who&#8217;s musical stylings are probably the best part of the whole show. This post is primarily for one of my keenest commenters, <a href="http://twitter.com/REDRami">Rami</a>.</p>
<p>via <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/03/01/the-office-musical-video_n_170887.html">Huff post</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.devolute.net/2009/03/02/the-office-musical/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Scrawny racist slags off new first lady</title>
		<link>http://www.devolute.net/2009/01/04/scrawny-racist-slags-off-new-first-lady/</link>
		<comments>http://www.devolute.net/2009/01/04/scrawny-racist-slags-off-new-first-lady/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Jan 2009 17:23:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ian</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Anne Coulter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bitchyness]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[McCain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.devolute.net/?p=327</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Happy new year! Lets start with something predictable. Anne Coulter, the blonde Fox News Sturmführer, has a new book and she&#8217;s already being such an unbelievable bitch about new first lady, Michelle Obama. From the Daily News: Coulter wrote, &#8220;Her obvious imitation of Jackie O&#8217;s style &#8211; the flipped-under hair, the sleeveless A-line dresses, the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Happy new year! Lets start with something predictable. Anne Coulter, the blonde Fox News Sturmführer, has a new book and she&#8217;s already being such an unbelievable <strong>bitch</strong> about new first lady, Michelle Obama. From the <a href="http://www.nydailynews.com/gossip/2009/01/02/2009-01-02_meow_ann_coulter_hits_michelle_obama_ove.html">Daily News</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>Coulter wrote, &#8220;Her obvious imitation of Jackie O&#8217;s style &#8211; the flipped-under hair, the sleeveless A-line dresses, the short strands of fake pearls &#8211; would have been laughable if done by anyone other than a media-designated saint.&#8221;</p>
<p>Coulter said Cindy McCain, the wife of vanquished GOP nominee John McCain, &#8220;dressed well without freakishly imitating famous First Ladies in history.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>I found this amusing for two reasons; Firstly, Jackie dressed exactly how a first lady should. Any emulation of her look is common-sense for any woman lucky enough to be able to pull it off (read: not the Bush wives). Secondly, Cindy McCain? Well dressed?</p>
<div id="attachment_328" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 213px"><img class="size-full wp-image-328" title="A 'well dressed' Cindy McCain" src="http://www.devolute.net/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/cindy-mccain-b.jpg" alt="A 'well dressed' Cindy McCain" width="203" height="308" /><p class="wp-caption-text">A &#39;well dressed&#39; Cindy McCain</p></div>
<p>I can&#8217;t remember if that was before or after she stopped playing with <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fire_(Arthur_Brown_song)">the <em>Crazy World of Arthur Brown</em></a>. Yup; lets hope Coulter gets that jaw un-wired again and we can enjoy her dropping bitchy lol-bombs well after the inauguration.</p>
<p>via <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/01/03/ann-coulter-slams-michell_n_154947.html">Huffington Post</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.devolute.net/2009/01/04/scrawny-racist-slags-off-new-first-lady/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
