<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>devolute.net &#187; Development</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.devolute.net/category/development/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.devolute.net</link>
	<description>That which should be neither uttered nor expressed</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 20 Nov 2011 13:43:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>SYWP June Roundup: Web Matrix and Post Formats</title>
		<link>http://www.devolute.net/2011/06/19/sywp-june-roundup-web-matrix-and-post-formats/</link>
		<comments>http://www.devolute.net/2011/06/19/sywp-june-roundup-web-matrix-and-post-formats/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Jun 2011 16:45:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ian</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Wordpress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SYWP]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.devolute.net/?p=901</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The South Yorkshire WordPress User Group (SYWP) has been going for a few months now: another group under the banner of the GIST Hub. For me it’s been very useful. Not just from a WordPress point of view (in which I have some professional interest) but it’s also a great place to share general web [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The South Yorkshire WordPress User Group (SYWP) has been going for a few months now: another group under the banner of the <a href="http://thegisthub.net/">GIST Hub</a>. For me it’s been very useful. Not just from a WordPress point of view (in which I have some professional interest) but it’s also a great place to share general web knowledge. A couple of our members suggested that I take notes, so I post these here and on the <a href="http://wordpresscommunity.thegisthub.net/2011/uncategorized/june-roundup-web-matrix-and-post-formats/">SYWP blog</a>. Before I start, I&#8217;d just like to say thanks to everyone who contributed. Both talks provided some good food for thought.</p>
<h2>Kimb’s adventures in MS WebMatrix</h2>
<p>You read that right: Microsoft are all up in OpenSource now. <a href="http://www.mkjones.co.uk/">Kimb</a> (<a href="http://twitter.com/mkjones">@mkjones</a>) had tried it previously but after a great talk by <a href="http://twitter.com/AndroidRobb">@androidrobb</a> last month, he decided to try it again. His objectives were as follows:</p>
<ul>
<li>Install WordPress on a classic ASP server.</li>
<li>Do it without using XAMP etc.</li>
</ul>
<p><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-902" title="MS WebMatrix logo" src="http://www.devolute.net/wp-content/uploads/2011/06/webx-brand-bl.png" alt="MS WebMatrix logo" width="184" height="43" />The WebMatrix installer seemed very ‘Microsoft’: i.e. It offered to install lots of confusing things with very ‘branding’ sounding names. He ended up installing a lot of things that he didn’t actually know what they were. Kym works in a MS-heavy environment (the NHS), so to someone who’s not played in MS-land for years, it’s a little confusing. The good news is that unlike his previous experiences, installing the web platform did not seem to meddle with existing IIS settings.</p>
<p>One benefit of this whole process is that for IT bods who do not trust OpenSource stuff, they’re more likely to let it through if it’s actually being installed by legit MS software.</p>
<p><em>(Around this time <a href="http://twitter.com/jagusti">Jag</a> brought up a reference to the film ‘Magnolia’. I don’t think anyone understood.)</em></p>
<p>Installing WordPress however is simple. When you choose to install WordPress it automatically prompts you to install MySQL. It will even prompt you to choose a root password, all in within the nice (well, functional) GUI. The process is smart enough that, when you come to install a second WordPress website, it knows if you’ve already got MySQL installed. You choose where on the HDD to install it and there you go. Well, not quite. You’re dumped in the browser at the first of the famous <em>5 minute install</em>™ but your config.php is populated with all the right stuff. In many ways, this is a lot like the infamous scourge of the cheap web-hosts: <em>Fantastico</em>. Kimb suggested that you do this process twice: once on the web host and once on your local machine. As he showed us a screenshot of his environment, complete with IE7, there was a burst of excitement and jealousy from fellow NHS workers. They’re all still on IE6. What a hellish existence (Chrome 11, represent).</p>
<p>As I said during <a href="http://twitter.com/AndroidRobb">@AndroidRobb</a>&#8216;s talk, the <em>WebMatrix</em> database editor interface looks pretty good. No need to dip into <em>PHPMyAdmin</em>. With some playing about with permissions he got the db editor to talk to his external server with a similar Web Matrix setup. That said, I use the very pretty <em><a title="Sequel Pro OS X software" href="http://www.sequelpro.com/">Sequel Pro</a></em>, so that’s not so much of an issue for me but I think it’s pretty nice to have everything together and I guess that’s exactly what MS are going for (and what Adobe would probably go for with DW if they didn’t have the Photoshop empire to rely on).</p>
<p>During his talk he used the word ‘synergised’ once. He did not make coffee this time though. 7/10.</p>
<h2>Chris Hart on Post formats</h2>
<div id="attachment_903" class="wp-caption alignright" style="width: 243px"><img class="size-full wp-image-903  " title="A septagon" src="http://www.devolute.net/wp-content/uploads/2011/06/7-gone_approx.png" alt="The septagon was one shape that Chris sadly did not utilise" width="233" height="226" /><p class="wp-caption-text">The septagon was one shape that Chris sadly did not utilise</p></div>
<p>As <a href="http://chrishart.co/">Chris</a> (<a href="http://twitter.com/ch8rt">@ch8rt</a>) brought up his first slide it was clear that he’s forged a career as a designer. It featured 3 shapes: a circle, a square and a triangle. His presentation was about the new WordPress post formats, but his attitude was that of a Factory Records era Mancunian artwork revisit. Or something.</p>
<p>Initially post types seemed pretty cool. We’ve all been mucking around with categories for ages now, to try and theme posts depending on the type of post, ala <em>Tumblr</em>. Unfortunately WordPress only gives you a limited number of available post-type formats (aside, gallery, link, image, quote etc&#8230;) and this is not expandable. That’s not a very WordPress way to go about things imho. These are activated by ‘add_theme_support’ which is in our friend the functions file and at least we can choose which of these to use (so the whole load are not forced on you). Theming is simple with has_post_format(‘video’) or you can drop the post_class() in for your stylesheets to utilise.</p>
<p>The chosen posts formats are displayed in the ‘Posts’ admin menu, which is one nice advantage.</p>
<p>This direction is a little lacking and feels like a somewhat undeveloped and immature solution. People didn’t seem that keen, but it must be remembered that we’re all hardcore WordPress devs here (ha!) at <a title="SYWP hashtag on Twitter" href="http://twitter.com/#!/search/%23sywp">#sywp</a> but we could build systems for our clients using post formats that would be a lot easier than the whole categories nonsense we often subject people to.</p>
<p><a href="http://docs.google.com/present/view?id=ddksxkw6_25hhcwbjf7">He&#8217;s made his talk, shapes and all, available here</a>.</p>
<h2>Next month…</h2>
<p>People were obviously very keen to talk about gallery plug-ins, which conflicts with my fear of plug-ins and love of complete control over your markup. Maybe I’ll be proven wrong. Once again, events plug-ins were mentioned. People just want to find an events plug-in that works, but other more cynical people (well, me) say sod it. Just use Eventbrite.</p>
<p>We also talked about the <a href="http://wordpress.org/news/2011/06/wordpress-3-2-release-candidate/">3.2 Release Client</a> and decided the most interesting thing was the distraction-free writer which might be aimed at iPad owning, <em>iA Writer</em> using Stephen Fry fans. Possibly.</p>
<p>People want me to give a talk, but I’m so left-field, I’d probably do it on Expression Engine. Forgive me, SYWP.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.devolute.net/2011/06/19/sywp-june-roundup-web-matrix-and-post-formats/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Expose in Chrome</title>
		<link>http://www.devolute.net/2011/04/17/expose-in-chrome/</link>
		<comments>http://www.devolute.net/2011/04/17/expose-in-chrome/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Apr 2011 11:49:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ian</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Browsers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chrome]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OSX]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.devolute.net/?p=775</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[To enable, type about:flags into url bar and then enable Tab Overview (it&#8217;s probably the top option in Chrome 10.0.648). Alternatively, if you have less than 3 fingers or no trackpad, then try Ctrl &#8211; Cmd &#8211; T. Via advice on Reddit]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 510px"><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/devolute/5627351156/"><img class=" " title="Expose in Google Chrome" src="http://farm6.static.flickr.com/5229/5627351156_1027d60ef8.jpg" alt="Expose in Google Chrome" width="500" height="313" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">No more ctrl-tabbing</p></div>
<p>To enable, type about:flags into url bar and then enable Tab Overview (it&#8217;s probably the top option in Chrome 10.0.648). Alternatively, if you have less than 3 fingers or no trackpad, then try Ctrl &#8211; Cmd &#8211; T.</p>
<p>Via advice on <a href="http://www.reddit.com/r/apple/comments/grh1p/like_expos%c3%a9_like_chrome_for_mac_youll_love_this/">Reddit</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.devolute.net/2011/04/17/expose-in-chrome/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Analyticator WordPress plug-in gets some dashboard-based awesome</title>
		<link>http://www.devolute.net/2009/07/16/analyticator-wordpress-plug-in-gets-some-dashboard-based-awesome/</link>
		<comments>http://www.devolute.net/2009/07/16/analyticator-wordpress-plug-in-gets-some-dashboard-based-awesome/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 19:24:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ian</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Wordpress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dashboard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google analytics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[plug-ins]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.devolute.net/?p=451</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[My WordPress installs have benefitted from the Google Analyticator plug-in for ages now. Partially through the lazyness of keeping my calls to the GA (Google Analytics) javascript up to date. But now there is a much better reason to use it.  They&#8217;ve built in an interface that can be embeded on your WordPress dashboard. Now [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My WordPress installs have benefitted from the <a href="http://plugins.spiralwebconsulting.com/analyticator.html"><strong>Google Analyticator</strong> plug-in</a> for ages now. Partially through the lazyness of keeping my calls to the GA (Google Analytics) javascript up to date. But now there is a much better reason to use it.  They&#8217;ve built in an interface that can be embeded on your WordPress dashboard. Now I don&#8217;t have to clunk my way into the GA interface to see my stats.</p>
<div id="attachment_452" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 357px"><img class="size-full wp-image-452" title="Analyticator" src="http://www.devolute.net/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/analyticator.png" alt="Google Analyticator gets your stats in your WordPress dashboard" width="347" height="378" /><p class="wp-caption-text">Google Analyticator puts stats on your WordPress dashboard</p></div>
<p>Yes, embaressing stats. But I do get the odd spike every now and again. Honest! The Google Analyticator plug-in for WordPress requires authentication with Google. This is the 2nd piece of software I&#8217;ve used which has taken advantage of the GA API in such a way; the first one being the very pretty <a href="http://ego-app.com/"><strong>Ego</strong> for the iPhone</a>, which allows you to keep track of some basic stats across your sites on one convenient page.</p>
<p><a href="http://plugins.spiralwebconsulting.com/analyticator.html">Grab Google Analyticator for you blog now</a>. It works with most themes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.devolute.net/2009/07/16/analyticator-wordpress-plug-in-gets-some-dashboard-based-awesome/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google SearchWiki makes me nervous</title>
		<link>http://www.devolute.net/2008/11/26/google-searchwiki-makes-me-nervous/</link>
		<comments>http://www.devolute.net/2008/11/26/google-searchwiki-makes-me-nervous/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2008 19:08:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ian</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Search and SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[I fear change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search wiki]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.devolute.net/?p=259</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Time for some more Google, but a bit less sarcasm. Google recently announced (and put live) their &#8216;SearchWiki&#8217; feature. Tagline: &#8220;Make search your own&#8221;. This makes me uncomfortable for three reasons: Everything Google does makes me nervous. They are basically the search engine. What else is there? Cuil? Get outta here! Yahoo!? What! About! The! [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="size-full wp-image-262 size-full alignleft" title="New Google wiki results" src="http://www.devolute.net/wp-content/uploads/2008/11/googlewiki.gif" alt="New Google wiki results screenshot" width="160" height="276" />Time for some more Google, but a bit less sarcasm. Google <a href="http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2008/11/searchwiki-make-search-your-own.html">recently announced</a> (and put live) their &#8216;SearchWiki&#8217; feature. Tagline: &#8220;Make search your own&#8221;. This makes me uncomfortable for three reasons:</p>
<h3>Everything Google does makes me nervous.</h3>
<p>They are basically <strong>the</strong> search engine. What else is there? Cuil? Get outta here! Yahoo!? What! About! The! Shouting!? MSN Live search, the search engine of &#8216;soccer moms&#8217; everywhere? Nah, Google are it. Even on a little site like this where I pimp myself out to the odd social network and I have readers coming in from RSS; Google brings in the bulk of traffic. Anything they change effects all webmasters. If it doesn&#8217;t, then I don&#8217;t think they&#8217;re very good webmasters. This is something that could potentially alter current SEO thinking.</p>
<h3>Visual clutter.</h3>
<p>Now this is being fussy, perhaps the designer in me speaking, but I think a large part of the reason why people use Google over other services is that it just does the job well without much visual clutter. Try looking at the initial Google search page compared with the Yahoo one. It&#8217;s a lot tidier. These new buttons next to every search result makes the whole thing a lot busier.</p>
<h3>They&#8217;ll kill what I love.</h3>
<p>Currently you only see the changes that <em>you</em> make using the search wiki but things can change. I find most of the best stuff on the web through services like reddit, Stumbleupon and digg (well, less so digg these days). If google decide they want the user-generated rankings to effect the global search rankings than this could effectively kill off the other guys.</p>
<p>Obviously it&#8217;s early days for this feature and I&#8217;ll be honest; I personally feel uncomfortable using it. If a search result isn&#8217;t in the top #10 then it&#8217;s for a reason. I don&#8217;t want to change anything. Lets see if in a few months if I&#8217;m any less reactionary about it.</p>
<p><a href="http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2008/11/searchwiki-make-search-your-own.html">The Official Google blog offers a announcement here, with an explanatory video</a> featuring their chirpy as usual engineers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.devolute.net/2008/11/26/google-searchwiki-makes-me-nervous/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google Chrome: time to cut the crap</title>
		<link>http://www.devolute.net/2008/09/08/google-chrome-time-to-cut-the-crap/</link>
		<comments>http://www.devolute.net/2008/09/08/google-chrome-time-to-cut-the-crap/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 20:36:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ian</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Browsers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chrome]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web 2.0]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.devolute.net/?p=155</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I know it&#8217;s early days. The new Google browser is on Version 0.2 and I&#8217;m sure more features will come, more options and less bugs. It&#8217;s a browser with potential. It&#8217;s pretty fast, it does everything you want (tabs, good javascript support, privacy modes, W3C compliant rendering through webkit) but it&#8217;s just a bloody browser. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know it&#8217;s early days. The new Google browser is on Version 0.2 and I&#8217;m sure more features will come, more options and less bugs. It&#8217;s a browser with potential. It&#8217;s pretty fast, it does everything you want (tabs, good javascript support, privacy modes, W3C compliant rendering through webkit) but it&#8217;s just a bloody browser. In some JS tests, it&#8217;s not even as fast as Firefox.</p>
<p>Unfortunately, it seems like it&#8217;s only <a href="http://www.theregister.co.uk/2008/09/08/dziuba_chrome/"><em>El Reg</em> who have noticed</a> this.</p>
<blockquote><p>People are calling Chrome a cloud operating system because it is a &#8220;platform for running web apps&#8221;. It renders HTML and interprets Javascript, you know, like every fucking browser made since 1995. It&#8217;s also got Google Gears built in. Great. I&#8217;ll alert Tim Berners-Lee.</p></blockquote>
<p>They are completely right. The gushing over Chrome by otherwise insightful blogs like Techcrunch about it being a challenger to WIndows is ridiculous. I wish it was, but it&#8217;s simply not. Get a grip people!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.devolute.net/2008/09/08/google-chrome-time-to-cut-the-crap/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Secrets in websites</title>
		<link>http://www.devolute.net/2008/01/13/secrets-in-websites/</link>
		<comments>http://www.devolute.net/2008/01/13/secrets-in-websites/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Jan 2008 20:18:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ian</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[teh internets]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.devolute.net/2008/01/13/secrets-in-websites/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This collection of web-site nosey-ness is evidence that web devs do have a sense of humour! Well, almost. Nice to see the geeks at top sites like facebook are as frustrated as I am when it comes to hacking the crappy IE box-model into working properly. Makes me feel&#8230; like a proper front-end web developer. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This <a href="http://robert.accettura.com/archives/2008/01/11/secrets-in-websites-ii/">collection of web-site nosey-ness</a> is evidence that web devs do have a sense of humour!  Well, almost. Nice to see the geeks at top sites like facebook are as frustrated as I am when it comes to hacking the crappy IE box-model into working properly. Makes me feel&#8230; like a proper front-end web developer.</p>
<p>I wonder if I can get away with sneaking stuff like this into my clients work, as an aid to my occasional frustration.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.devolute.net/2008/01/13/secrets-in-websites/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Safari for Windows</title>
		<link>http://www.devolute.net/2007/06/11/safari-for-windows/</link>
		<comments>http://www.devolute.net/2007/06/11/safari-for-windows/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jun 2007 22:55:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ian</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Browsers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Safari]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.devolute.net/2007/06/11/safari-for-windows/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There have been rumours about this floating around for a while but it just happened! As soon as Jobs ended today&#8217;s WWDC keynote (yes I did follow it live, yes I do need to get out more) a beta release of version 3 was made available, for Windows as well as OS X. I&#8217;ve tried [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a title="flickr - safari on windows" href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/devolute/541370098/"><img align="left" alt="This site in Safari 3 beta for windows" title="This site in Safari 3 beta for windows" src="http://farm2.static.flickr.com/1261/541370098_e57f63988a_m.jpg" /></a>There have been rumours about this floating around for a while but it just happened! As soon as Jobs ended today&#8217;s WWDC keynote (yes I did follow it live, <strong>yes</strong> I do need to get out more) <a href="http://www.apple.com/safari/">a beta release of version 3 was made available</a>, for Windows as well as OS X. I&#8217;ve tried it and to be honest, I don&#8217;t particularly like it. The interface is too clunky. However; that&#8217;s pretty irrelevant. As a developer this is great news. I can test my sites double quick to make sure they work in Safari. It even uses Mac-like font smoothing. The prospect of more developers being able to test their work thoroughly has got to be great news for Mac users. Way to go Apple.</p>
<p>The other good news is that <a href="http://www.macrumors.com/2007/06/06/zfs-to-become-default-file-system-in-leopard/">OSX will support ZFS</a> (presumably this will lead to better interaction with linux machines) and they finally got rid of that horrible brushed metal effect. It always reminded me of my primary school serving counters at lunchtime. Ugh. I used to shudder as cheap cutlery slid across the surface. Regardless, I&#8217;m thinking of doing that unspeakable, bighting the bullet and buying a Macbook so although I feel a little dirty, all this Mac progression is all good. I just got to make sure I don&#8217;t turn into one of those Mac rumour-mill fan-boy types.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.devolute.net/2007/06/11/safari-for-windows/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Firebug. A lifesaver.</title>
		<link>http://www.devolute.net/2007/02/06/firebug-a-lifesaver/</link>
		<comments>http://www.devolute.net/2007/02/06/firebug-a-lifesaver/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Feb 2007 20:52:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ian</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[teh internets]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.devolute.net/2007/02/06/firebug-a-lifesaver/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A colleague pretty much ordered me to install the new(-ish) Firefox plug-in Firebug onto my machine at work. Now it&#8217;s on my machine at home. Why? Because it makes my job at least twice as easy as it was before. I won&#8217;t bore you with details; I&#8217;ll just say that even alongside other helpful tools [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img align="left" alt="Firebug screenshot" title="Firebug screenshot" src="http://devolute.net/images/news/firebug.gif" />A colleague pretty much ordered me to install <a href="http://www.getfirebug.com/blog/2007/01/24/one-dot-oh/">the new(-ish) Firefox plug-in Firebug</a> onto my machine at work. Now it&#8217;s on my machine at home. Why? Because it makes my job at least twice as easy as it was before. I won&#8217;t bore you with details; I&#8217;ll just say that even alongside other helpful tools such as the <a href="http://chrispederick.com/work/webdeveloper/">Web Developer</a> plug-in, it&#8217;s super-handy if you&#8217;re building pages, regardless of whether you&#8217;re an amateur, a pro, or <a href="http://www.devolute.net/about">someone</a> who fools himself into thinking he&#8217;s both. The drill is basically as follows: Hit F12. Press &#8216;Inspect&#8217;. Hover over any element on your page and click on it to see what css values that element is using (or not using). You can even change values &#8216;on the fly&#8217; and the page will update in front of your very eyes (locally at least). It&#8217;s the perfect bug-fixing tool.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m now going to go do a little bit of fixing elsewhere. Previously, I wouldn&#8217;t have been arsed to bother with it had Firebug not made re-understanding previously forgotten old tag soup so easy.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.getfirebug.com/">Get Firebug here</a>. If not for me, then for your own sanity!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.devolute.net/2007/02/06/firebug-a-lifesaver/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

